|
 |
View previous topic :: View next topic
:: View posts since last visit |
Author |
Message |
msyed
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:25 pm Post subject: Question about graphite_rods, types of Graphite |
|
|
I was just making a list of items parts, measurements etc (basic blue prints and stuff i need b4 sewing). And i came to the topic of Graphite rods..
Now making kites seemed fairly inexpensive till that point or am i missing something?
Can someone explain the following terms to me?
Pultruded
Wrapped
Solid (well duh i guess, solid is solid Carbon)
with respect to graphit rods.
2nd. Avia and SkyShark two makers of rods that are well known--strengths and weaknesses or there arent any ?
3rd. How do you know what diameter rods to order, what weight, and im guessing you can order rods only in set sizes? i.e. 32.5" size of rod.
4th Ive looked through sooooooo many different rods, now my heads spinning with names and descriptions, and many sound the same!
Are there certain types of rods that people use in general for your regular freestyle dual line (made to fly in moderate winds? 3-4 mph +)?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
Progcraft Kitebuilder of the Year 2004


Joined: 29 Sep 2003 Posts: 2559 Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
Spence602

Joined: 16 Sep 2003 Posts: 475 Location: USA TX Houston
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
msyed,
You sound just like I sounded a few years ago - adrift in a sea of manufacturers names and numbers and how they all relate to one another. And that's just the tubes/rods. Then there's the nocks, c-clips, spreader connectors, ferrels, center tee's, End Caps, etc. and what fits on what. Whew!
Just keep asking questions!
Here is another spar chart with relative strengths and weights. It's a little dated (there are SkyShark P-90's (10.5 grams) and P-400's (21 grams) out now).
Here is also some more info on Avia rods, and here is more info about Skyshark tubes.
1) I know KiteSquid can wax eloquently on the subtle (and not so subtle) differences in Pultruded and Wrapped. He can probably point you to a place where he's already explained it.
2) Neither manufacturer is better - each tube/rod has its own place.
3) If you're building from a plan, it'll probably have recommended spars. If not, it's whatever you want. Weight vs strength (vs availability vs cost vs accessibility!)
4) It all depends. I've seen kites for 3-4MPH with .196 CFR (solid rod), some with P-100's, some with mixed G-Force tubes, and some with 6mm/.230 spines and the rest Excel tubes, etc.
Personally, I started out building a freestyle stunt kite with .230 tubes all around. Since that time, I've used G-Force, Excel, Skysharks P-xxx and tapered, Structil, and other Avia tubes/rods. I still like the feel of .230/.240 Avia.
HTH _________________ Spence
www.kiteshark.org
Air: Refreshing when stirred up and served cool on a hot day. |
|
Back to top |
|
msyed
Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Sat Aug 28, 2004 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
appreciate the input! yah, and spars seem to be the most expensive part too |
|
Back to top |
|
Stan

Joined: 18 Nov 2003 Posts: 760 Location: San Diego
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2004 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To grossly generalize, I'd guess that 6mm or 2300 pultruded spars are the most versatile and economical spars to start out with. Smaller spars and rods will suit UL kites, and fancier kites can be sparred with wrapped spars to get more stiffness at a lighter weight. It all depends on the kite, and after you make a few, changing incrementally to other sizes will show their strengths and weaknesses. |
|
Back to top |
|
KiteSquid Master Kite Builder


Joined: 29 Aug 2003 Posts: 3496 Location: USA Virginia King George
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2004 8:03 am Post subject: Re: Question about graphite_rods |
|
|
msyed wrote: |
Now making kites seemed fairly inexpensive till that point or am i missing something? |
Nope, you found where all my kite building $$$$ go to!!!!!!
msyed wrote: | Can someone explain the following terms to me? |
Sure..
A process were the Carbon fiber reinforeced structure is made by both Pulling and Extrudign takes place. The manufacturer selects the number of and type of Carbon fibers to make up the structure and runs it thru a die and also injects an epoxy into the die. The die is heated to make the Epoxy setup. also he has to pull on the completed structure or it would get jammed in the die, thus making his day longer and your parts more expensive.
In the Pulltruding process ALL of the Carbon fibers run the length of the structure so it has the lowest strength to weight ratio...
The manufactures selects an internal diamater of a tube to make and he gets some steel rods in that diatmater that are polished quite fine. they coat it with some kind of release agent (usualy a specialized wax in a spay can) and place the rod in a computer controled lathe. They run Carbon tow thru a bath of epoxy and then turn the rod and wrap layers of of Carbon onto it in spefic angles to get the strength they designed it for. They then place the rod in an oven over night to make the epoxy set, then they pull the steel rod out of the completed tube that they then trim to length.
The usualy add more layers for more strength or use a larger diamater ID to make it stronger and lighter. They can also add extra wraps to the tube in spefic areas if desired.
This process is of course the most expensive to complete... but gives the higest strength to weight ratio..
msyed wrote: |
Solid (well duh i guess, solid is solid Carbon) |
Usualy Pultrruded but it does not have a hole in the center. These rods are usualy made in smaller diamtaters and are teh most flexable of the bunch.
msyed wrote: | 2nd. Avia and SkyShark two makers of rods that are well known--strengths and weaknesses or there arent any ? |
Their spars are designed diffrently so you have to select the proper product to fit into your application....
msyed wrote: | 3rd. How do you know what diameter rods to order, what weight, and im guessing you can order rods only in set sizes? i.e. 32.5" size of rod. |
That is sometime seat of the pants or just what do I have laying around... or how deep my pockets are at the time.
msyed wrote: | 4th Ive looked through sooooooo many different rods, now my heads spinning with names and descriptions, and many sound the same!
Are there certain types of rods that people use in general for your regular freestyle dual line (made to fly in moderate winds? 3-4 mph +)? |
it depends on many factors that are mutulay exclusive...
Cost
Durabiltly
Strength
Weight
No Problem.... _________________ VR/
KiteSquid
AKA TakoIka
AKA Harold
King George VA
P.S. Yet another post by the Squid..... Doesent he ever shut up???
P.P.S. The wind is like the air, only pushier.
Last edited by KiteSquid on Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
Fred

Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 72 Location: Derry, NH
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:42 am Post subject: Rather than start a new topic... |
|
|
...this topic seems close enough.
Hi folks,
If I wanted to beef-up the framework of an existing wooden framed kite that utilized 1/4" wooden dowels, would a fiberglass A20 be a good upgrade, or should I be looking at Carbon fiber?
I've blown out a few 1/4" spans of the wood . . . figuring I need somthing more robust, but I don't want to add weight if I can avoid it. I tried 5/16" doweling, and the kite developed some odd behaviors that I *think* is related to a weight-forward increase.
The kite in question is an 8' Double French-Military that I scaled up from my old "White Bird's" designed kite, and the spans in question are the upper spreaders. They fail in strong breezes on this kite, but work fine on the smaller White-Bird version.
It was one of my first attempts at scaling, and works fine in light wind, but I've grown fond of being dragged around the field and now fly it in stronger breezes regularly...untill it explodes that is. I thought about carrying a quiver of 1/4" shafts that I can swap in but I'd much rather ruggedize the thing. _________________ Kiting since 1964...
TreeProof since 1979. |
|
Back to top |
|
Progcraft Kitebuilder of the Year 2004


Joined: 29 Sep 2003 Posts: 2559 Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
Fred

Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Posts: 72 Location: Derry, NH
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 12:41 pm Post subject: Helps a bit, yes. |
|
|
I use Dan Leigh's data for my deltas, and it seems to work well. But what isn't conveyed is the relative 'durability' of the material, but rather the relative stiffness.
This would work if the following could be said:
For Stiffness: 6mm wood = 5mm fiberglass
For Durability: 5mm fiberglass = 6mm wood
Intuitively, I'd expect this to be the case given some of my unrelated experience with fiberglass constructions (non-kiting), but I have no experience specifically with spars, so ordering some blind would be a calculated risk.
Is it safe to assume that 5mm fiberglass will withstand more than 6mm wood? _________________ Kiting since 1964...
TreeProof since 1979. |
|
Back to top |
|
KiteSquid Master Kite Builder


Joined: 29 Aug 2003 Posts: 3496 Location: USA Virginia King George
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2004 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: Helps a bit, yes. |
|
|
Fred wrote: |
Is it safe to assume that 5mm fiberglass will withstand more than 6mm wood?
|
I would say YES!!!
But there is a weight penalty. _________________ VR/
KiteSquid
AKA TakoIka
AKA Harold
King George VA
P.S. Yet another post by the Squid..... Doesent he ever shut up???
P.P.S. The wind is like the air, only pushier. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
View posts since last visit
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
 |
Kitebuilder.com Forum © 2005
Powered by phpBB 2.0.15 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
 |
|
|